A number of Minnesota religious groups reiterated their support Thursday for Gov. Tim Walz's cautious approach to church reopenings, even as Catholic bishops and some Lutheran leaders plan to break his restrictions.
The Minnesota Council of Churches, the Minnesota Rabbinical Association, and the Minnesota State Baptist Convention stepped forward to support Walz's orders to refrain from opening churches too quickly to limit the spread of the coronavirus.
"We support the cautious, science-driven, and health-focused approach that the governor has followed for the reopening of houses of worship," said the Rev. Curtiss DeYoung, president of the Minnesota Council of Churches.
The expression of support contrasted with that of Archbishop Bernard Hebda of the Catholic Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis, who spoke at two news conferences Thursday to insist that churches can be reopened safely. Hebda said he planned to meet with Walz in hopes of reaching common ground.
"These are very challenging times, and I recognize [Walz] has a difficult job," Hebda said, adding that Catholic leaders "have always been ready to work cooperatively" with the governor.
Hebda's remarks came a day after Minnesota's Catholic bishops and the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod announced they would defy Walz's safety guidelines for houses of worship. The guidelines call for capping attendance at 10 people, with a gradual increase expected as COVID-19 cases decline. Both groups said they would open churches to one-third capacity, starting May 26. Hebda said churches that reopen would need to meet the archdiocese's safety standards, which include social distancing and sanitation.
Hebda's media appearances were announced by the Washington, D.C.-based Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which wrote Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison a letter arguing that the continued closure of churches violates the First Amendment.
The fund describes itself as a public interest law firm defending religious freedom. It represented Hobby Lobby Stores in a 2014 landmark Supreme Court decision that exempted the family-owned retail chain from a federal mandate requiring employers to cover contraceptives for female employees.