On the day House Republicans passed their signature $2 billion tax cut bill last week, they offered an amendment designed to trap the DFL minority: a gas tax increase similar to that supported by Gov. Mark Dayton and Senate Democrats and seen as politically unpopular.
Democrats unanimously voted against the amendment. Nevertheless, that day, mailers from the Republican-aligned Minnesota Jobs Coalition showed up in mailboxes in several key DFL House districts, attacking them for pushing a gas tax increase. Democrats saw the mailers as a coordinated attack between Republicans at the Capitol and interest group allies. The Jobs Coalition and House Republicans denied they had worked in tandem.
Allegations about coordinated attacks are flying more frequently in both directions on the state and national levels, as laws governing political donations and coordination between political groups and outside allies grows increasingly murky.
While DFLers have regularly faced similar charges from Republicans of gaming the increasingly deregulated campaign finance system, Gov. Mark Dayton on Monday threatened to wield his veto pen against several GOP-backed campaign finance changes that he and DFL lawmakers said would undermine the disclosure of special interest spending to influence elections.
"It'd be a terrible direction for Minnesota," Dayton said of the GOP measures, which are tucked into a much larger finance bill to fund numerous state operations. "We have a history of strong campaign finance protections."
The specific GOP-backed provisions would effectively end campaign spending limits for statewide candidates, including those running for governor, constitutional officers and state legislative races. House Republicans also voted to allow campaigns to collect limitless numbers of donations from lobbyists and political action committees, and for an end to Minnesota's public subsidies for campaigns.
"Do the citizens of Minnesota really want to see their tax dollars going to politicians' campaigns?" said Rep. Sarah Anderson, R-Plymouth, sponsor of the state government bill. She noted that DFLers in recent election cycles have received more political donations overall than have Republicans.
The growing looseness around campaign finance laws is attributed largely to the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court ruling now referred to as "Citizens United," which held that First Amendment free speech rights prohibit the government from restricting political expenditures by such non-campaign groups as nonprofits, corporations and labor unions.