The 2020 election is shaping dueling visions for new voting laws as the Legislature aims to resolve competing GOP Senate and DFL House bills in the last two weeks of the session.
Republicans are proposing changes to how absentee ballots are received and counted, while Democrats want to make permanent certain changes put in place to adjust to the pandemic during the last statewide election.
"Our focus was on transparency and security," state Sen. Mary Kiffmeyer, R-Big Lake, said before the Senate passed a sweeping supplemental funding bill this month that includes a series of voting bills she sponsored.
A longtime GOP priority to require photo identification to vote in Minnesota also passed the Senate last year, although it is unlikely to muster much, if any, support from Democrats who believe it would suppress voter turnout. Republican candidates for statewide offices have often called for voter ID legislation this year.
House Democrats, in their election law proposals, want to impose new civil penalties for intimidating or threatening election workers, painting it as a necessary response to a rise in harassment brought on by the discord over the 2020 vote.
"Amidst a troubling rise in the demonization, intimidation, and downright threats directed at election officials, Democrats in the Minnesota House are taking action to protect the individuals who make sure our elections are administered with integrity and accuracy," DFL House Majority Leader Ryan Winkler, who is running for Hennepin County attorney, said in a statement after the House cleared that and other voting law proposals last month. "We will not allow unfounded allegations or conspiracy theories to tarnish Minnesota's best-in-the-nation elections system."
The Senate GOP proposals include allowing political parties or nonpartisan candidates to appoint "ballot board observers" to watch the handling of ballots. Republicans are also proposing livestreaming footage of ballot board activity and absentee ballot drop boxes.
Secretary of State Steve Simon, a DFLer, is a vocal opponent of such measures. Like Winkler, he argued that the GOP proposals "seem to be inspired by conspiracy theories and disinformation."