Victims of workplace sexual harassment or discrimination at the Minnesota Capitol — and in workplaces around the state — could find it easier to take formal action against their harassers under proposals making their way through the state House and Senate.
A bill introduced by House Majority Leader Joyce Peppin, R-Rogers, and backed by several dozen other Republican and DFL House members, would update the Minnesota Human Rights Act to expand the category of behavior that could contribute to an "intimidating, hostile or offensive" work environment. Specifically, the harassing behavior would no longer have to be considered "severe and pervasive" to be considered a violation of state law, and the House's own harassment policy.
Matt Swenson, a spokesman for DFL Gov. Mark Dayton, said that Dayton and Peppin were meeting Monday to discuss the proposal.
Later in the day, Sen. Karin Housley, R-St. Marys Point, introduced a similar bill for consideration by the Senate.
Speaking earlier Monday after a House subcommittee agreed to advance the bill, Peppin said the surge of attention to workplace harassment has made it clear that the decades-old legal standard that's in place doesn't match current thinking. While sexual harassment at work is against the law, she said many cases involving clearly inappropriate behavior have been dismissed because courts found it wasn't "severe and pervasive" enough to warrant legal action. As a result, it's been nearly impossible for many victims to challenge their harassers, she said.
"Things have changed a lot in the last 30 years ... and it's very clear the bar is too high for someone to come forward and actually have their day in court," Peppin said.
In a news release touting her bill, Housley made a similar argument.
"This is about making the law as clear as possible and standing up to say, 'Workplace harassment of any kind will not be tolerated in our state,' " she said. "If an employee feels a line has been crossed, they should know the law has their backs — and that's what this legislation does. It allows judges to consider other factors beyond the 'severe or pervasive' standard."