Minnesota lawmakers remain divided over the size of a construction project borrowing bill this year, with an infusion of federal dollars adding to the uncertainty.
Minnesota legislators split over construction funding bill as session draws to a close
May 15, 2021 at 8:03PM
Sen. Tom Bakk, I-Cook, said Friday he does not think there will be a "breakthrough" on a public infrastructure bill before the session ends Monday. Bakk, the Senate bonding committee chairman, suggested a $240 million bill along with the $179 million infrastructure investment from the federal government. House Democrats are pushing a roughly $1 billion package.
"We're probably a little out in front of our skis with getting a larger bill together," Bakk said. "There's just much we don't know about the federal money."
The House must vote on a bonding bill before the Senate. Rep. Fue Lee, DFL-Minneapolis, told the Ways and Means Committee on Friday they should take advantage of the low 2.4% interest rate to make investments, including repairing Twin Cities communities damaged by unrest. "It's almost a year now and those businesses are still struggling to build back up," Lee said.
The House committee's vote on Lee's proposal was split along partisan lines. Rep. Pat Garofalo, R-Farmington, said the bill would not get the supermajority needed to pass on the House floor. "We just passed a massive bonding bill last October," he said. "A little bit of fiscal discipline isn't going to hurt anybody."
Jessie Van Berkel
about the writer
Our mission this election cycle is to provide the facts and context you need. Here’s how we’ll do that.
