All in all, it's not just another brick in the toy chest.
At least that's the conclusion you might reach after reading a new book coedited by University of Minnesota philosophy professor Roy T. Cook titled "LEGO and Philosophy: Constructing Reality Brick by Brick."
Cook and co-editor Sondra Bacharach, a senior lecturer in philosophy at the Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand, recruited a bunch of other deep thinkers to write about issues raised by the venerable plastic building blocks.
Nearly 100 people responded to the call for essays, 21 of which are in the book. The essayists, many of them fellow philosophy professors, dove into issues about Lego and gender stereotypes, Lego and ethics, Lego and the nature of impermanence, Lego and German philosopher Martin Heidegger, Lego and autonomy and the human individual (Lego my ego?).
Cook was the right man to edit the book because, while his day job involves thinking about the philosophical facets of paradoxes, in his free time, he's a Lego master builder with a collection of more than 3 million Lego pieces in his Minneapolis home.
He was commissioned to do large-scale Lego models of the Minnesota State Capitol and the Cathedral of St. Paul. He built a 45,000-piece Lego version of the Split Rock Lighthouse that is on display at that site on the North Shore.
Cook said "it took a good bit of convincing" to get publisher John Wiley & Sons to accept the idea of a book about Lego in its Blackwell Philosophy and Pop Culture Series. But he and Bacharach argue that, strictly speaking, Lego isn't a toy. It's a physical and storytelling medium.
Yes, the pieces can be used to build a toy. But people also have used the bricks to assemble desks, make full-sized houses, even create a prosthetic leg.