The Minnesota State colleges and universities system will review its harassment and discrimination policy and re-evaluate how it structures administrator contracts amid criticism of how it's handled college president misconduct cases.
Minnesota State Chancellor Devinder Malhotra and the system's board of trustees announced the reviews Wednesday after Star Tribune reports revealed that Malhotra allowed a former president of Hennepin Technical College to stay on the job amid multiple accusations of harassment and discrimination.
"Sometimes, our approaches and decisions fall way short of getting the desired results. This was the case at Hennepin Technical College," Malhotra said, issuing a public apology during the board of trustees meeting. "When I met with them, the Hennepin Technical College community was candid and forthcoming in expressing their profound disappointment in me and the system office in addressing the climate issues in a timely and responsive manner."
Former Hennepin Technical College President Merrill Irving Jr. resigned last month after a Star Tribune report detailed accusations that he belittled co-workers who had disabilities and made sexually derogatory comments about colleagues. Minnesota House Republicans called for Irving to resign after the report.
Upon his resignation, Irving was immediately reassigned to an administrative job in the Minnesota State system's central office, where he will be employed through June 30 on his same presidential salary of $232,000. The Minnesota State system has been criticized by legislators and student groups for appointing college presidents who step down amid accusations of misconduct to high-paying administrative jobs in its central office.
"It is clear that there is a larger systemic issue here that can no longer be ignored," said Axel Kylander, president of the community college student association LeadMN. "It is time to change the culture at Minnesota State."
System leaders are reviewing the harassment and discrimination policy and will propose changes to the board in May, Malhotra said.
Minnesota State leaders found that Irving made "derisive statements about individuals of a protected class" but determined his comments were not "pervasive or severe" enough to merit being a violation of the current policy. Malhotra said an updated policy needs to be "more responsive" to prevent similar situations from occurring.