Mikki Morrissette turned 23 on April 16, 1985, which she notes with amusement also was the date the first issue of a biweekly newspaper called Minnesota Women's Press was delivered. After attending the University of Minnesota, where she worked for the Minnesota Daily, Morrissette spent 18 years in New York working in magazine and new media publishing before returning home to write for that very newspaper-turned-monthly magazine. In 2017, Morrissette bought Minnesota Women's Press (MWP) from then co-publishers Norma Smith Olson and Kathy Magnuson. As MWP celebrates its 35th anniversary, Morrissette reflects on its bold reporting, financial challenges and exciting plans for 2021.
Q: Congrats on 35 years, which makes MWP among the longest continuously run feminist publication in the U.S. To what do you attribute its longevity?
A: The mission of original co-publishers Glenda Martin and Mollie Hoben was and continues to be to showcase women as experts whose place is in the news. Women's voices do tend to be overlooked in mainstream media, although that is less true now. Advertisers have stuck with us, some for more than 30 years. While our small staff had to deal with pay cuts this year, we are all intact, working with vision and energy to address pressing issues. From the beginning, our reporting and first-person narratives have examined gender-based violence, justice reform, political representation.
Q: You noted it was painful having to pick from thousands of stories for your 162-page commemorative anniversary book, "35 Years of Minnesota Women." How did you do it?
A: When we started digging into dozens of boxes of archived print issues, it was apparent that curating and condensing would be an extensive process. A few of us leafed through all the pages and noted stories that stood out. In the end, 550 stories made it into a database and only a fraction made it into this book. But much of our content will become part of our legacy of stories at womenspress.com.
Q: Did you hear of any pushback in the magazine's early years?
A: There were people who talked about how Ms. Magazine was starting to suffer due to decreased ad revenue — that "smacking of feminism" in the mid-'80s was a bad idea; that you shouldn't even use "women" in the title because it would narrow the readership. And people told the MWP launch team they'd run out of story ideas. To [co-publisher] Mollie's credit, she was tenacious about the fact that the publication should go forward and should do so as a for-profit. Women's voices have value.
Q: How has the pandemic impacted your financial health?