Opinion editor's note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. (To contribute, click here.) This commentary is included among a collection of articles that were submitted in response to, or are otherwise applicable to, Star Tribune Opinion's June 4 call for submissions on the question: "Where does Minnesota go from here?" Read the full collection of responses here.
•••
Plenty has been written about the results of the legislative session in Minnesota since May. There's no denying the bills signed into law will have wide-ranging impact on Minnesotans. One-party control gave us a fast-paced session passing bill after bill, each with big promises for what they would do.
The list included energy mandates, a slew of social policies, new business regulations and the launch of a new state-run paid leave program. It also included more than $9 billion in higher taxes on Minnesotans.
Democrats have been on a victory tour to tout the benefits of the session, and most recently have pointed to a CNBC ranking of states on business competitiveness.
However, the CNBC ranking makes the same mistakes Democrats make when looking at what it truly means to be a business-friendly state. According to CNBC, they use marketing documents put together by state agencies, and among the considerations given the lowest influence for ranking a state was the cost of living and business friendliness.
If it's not the cost of living and business friendliness, what do they consider more important in making a state competitive? Access to renewable energy, voting rights and abortion rights are all categories that weigh higher in these rankings than regulations and costs for business administration.
Whatever you think of the value of those policies, they are not directly tied to what it means to run a business.