Opinion editor's note: Editorials represent the opinions of the Star Tribune Editorial Board, which operates independently from the newsroom.
•••
Does Minneapolis have the right law enforcement leaders in place to carry out the reforms in policing necessary to rebuild trust and public safety? All Minnesotans should hope so, but recent incidents have raised new questions.
In recent months, several reports on Minneapolis Police Department operations have been issued with similar conclusions and recommendations. Last March, the Minnesota Department of Human Rights questioned how MPD officers use force, investigate crimes and discipline officers.
In July, the U.S. Justice Department concluded that MPD officers engaged in a pattern of racist and abusive behavior; that study is expected to result in a yearslong consent decree overseen by a federal court. And this week, a Harvard research team released an independent report about the department. It acknowledged some of the same issues and offered action items in violence prevention, response to community safety incidents and restorative justice.
"There's full alignment here — we all want a comprehensive approach to community safety in Minneapolis, and that's what we've set out to do," Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said Tuesday in a statement. "Next, we will be looking at how to implement these recommendations, furthering safety beyond policing work well into the future and therefore freeing officers up to do the most critical work."
Yet public confidence in the city's ability to carry out those plans has taken a hit because of the actions of its relatively new top law enforcers.
Shortly after Community Safety Commissioner Cedric Alexander was hired about a year ago, he said he regretted his "tone" in a Twitter exchange with citizens. In the back-and-forth, he sounded arrogant and dismissive of community input. It was a bad look, and he rightly took responsibility for it.