RUTLEDGE, Minn. — Two Pine County farms, less than 40 miles apart as the crow flies, are on opposite sides of a debate over racial discrimination in U.S. agriculture that's flaring anew but has deep roots in the nation's history.
Outside the small town of Rutledge, Harold Robinson and Angela Dawson joined Minnesota's tiny roster of Black farmland owners a few years ago with a 40-acre land purchase that they built into a small hemp farm and cooperative without government assistance. The acreage was symbolic: "Forty Acres and a Mule" was a post-Civil War military policy that briefly transferred ownership of farmland to people freed from slavery. White owners quickly re-seized most of it.
"It felt exactly like a sign," Robinson, a wiry Army veteran and former Hennepin County deputy, said as he stood among tall, fragrant hemp plants in one of their new greenhouses.
Just a short drive south, near Pine City, Jon Stevens farms row crops and raises cattle on about 750 acres. He borrowed heavily to buy land and equipment, and owed more than $270,000 to the U.S. Department of Agriculture as of April, he wrote in a recent affidavit.
Stevens and six other white Minnesota farmers are among the plaintiffs in a series of federal lawsuits aiming to block the Biden administration from distributing $4 billion in USDA loan forgiveness to farmers of color.
"Just because you're white doesn't automatically mean you can pay your bills," Stevens said.
Federal judges paused the loan forgiveness program over the summer, a win for the conservative legal foundations driving the lawsuits and a setback for Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack's effort to rectify the USDA's well-documented pattern of government neglect toward farmers of color.
But the agricultural sector continues its reckoning with the kind of institutional biases and equity gaps that are also being confronted by leaders of government agencies, businesses, schools and other walks of life.