Merriam-Webster has added 455 entries to the dictionary, and you might be bemused by their choices. Or you could be indifferent and otherwise nonplussed. It does beg the question: Why add words to the dictionary when people cannot correctly use the ones we already have?
You know, words like "bemused," "nonplussed," and phrases like "beg the question."
The dictionary's website says they added 455, but only lists 34. This is like Taco Bell saying they've added 14,293 new items to the menu, but only telling you about two of them. I mean, what are the other words? Maybe they might give us some necessary information about what's going on in the world, such as:
Zorgimufgren: the state of being momentarily paralyzed by a thick, hot, wet beam shot from a scout ship from the planet Orion; the word spoken in sheer terror by people who have just emerged from the paralysis.
Or ...
Cradgiddy: colloquial term for the levitating crustaceans that pour through the open windows of home with no explanation.
But no, they have to give us "amirite," amirite? (It's a sarcastic way of saying "Am I right," and is intended to indicate the opposite, sort of.) They think "dad bod" is a term anyone uses, when it's limited to underpaid People magazine headline writers chiding Leonardo DiCaprio for sporting a pasta paunch.
"Doorbell camera" is one of the new entries. First of all, that's two words, neither of which is new. Second, who needs to look in the dictionary for that one?