To some in the courtroom, the jury's decision brought a sigh of relief, and with it the hope that the conviction of Mohamed Noor meant change for a criminal justice system long seen as shielding officers from prosecution.
For others, it was a sign that the system remains stacked against people of color.
From its outset, the case had forced uncomfortable conversations about race and justice and begged the question whether Noor would have been charged if he were white and Damond had been black.
Tuesday's verdict did nothing to quell those suspicions.
It was never a flash point in the courtroom, but race lurked in the shadows of the monthlong trial.
Longtime civil rights activist Mel Reeves praised the verdict for demonstrating that "police shouldn't be above the law." At the same time, Reeves pointed to an aspect in this case that, he said, made it easier for the jury to convict Noor. "He's Somali. He's black. And he's Muslim — that's a trifecta."
Reeves said "the system has an easier time convicting a black man in a blue uniform." However, he added that in police shootings, "this is what should happen all the time."
Damond neighbor Sarah Kuhnen said, "We have to acknowledge that in our city, most victims of police violence are people of color and that racism and white supremacy are the reasons they don't receive the treatment Justine received. What Justine has gotten we want for everyone."