The first criminal trial in the sprawling Feeding Our Future case began Monday, questioning more than a dozen potential jurors about whether they could be impartial in the high-profile federal meal fraud case.
In all, 1,000 Minnesotans from across the state had been summoned by mail for the case, more than usual because of the publicity surrounding the scandal — one of the biggest fraud cases in the state, prosecutors have said.
By Monday, the pool of potential jurors had been narrowed to about 350 people — about four or five times the usual amount in a case like this.
No jurors were seated Monday. One by one, more than a dozen Minnesotans were questioned by U.S. District Judge Nancy Brasel in the downtown Minneapolis federal courthouse for about seven hours, including how much news coverage of the Feeding Our Future investigation they had seen, read or heard about since news of the FBI investigation broke in January 2022.
The potential jurors were asked at least 26 questions about their life and opinions, including their feelings about Islam, Muslims or people with East African backgrounds, particularly Somalia, given that a number of the witnesses and defendants are from or have connections to East Africa. Most of the potential jurors interviewed were white and from the Twin Cities metro area.
The prospective jurors were asked whether they’re familiar with the meal programs at the center of the case, funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to reimburse nonprofits, schools and day cares for feeding low-income children after school and during the summer. Brasel also asked if they had any connection to the USDA or Minnesota Department of Education — which oversaw the free meal programs in the state — or if anyone they knew had ever received the free meals.
“This is obviously going to go awhile,” Brasel told the courtroom.
The trial, which could last six weeks, is taking place more than two years after the FBI raided Feeding Our Future’s offices, publicly revealing allegations of a $250 million fraud, and more than a year and a half since the first charges were filed in the case. Prosecutors have called it one of the largest pandemic-related fraud cases in the country.