Erin Preese, a teacher and mother, is crystal clear on how she feels about arming teachers to combat school shootings.
"I absolutely wouldn't carry a gun," she said. "I wouldn't work in a school that allowed guns, and I wouldn't let my children go to a school that allowed guns. I know a lot of teachers that feel the same way."
Preese is the south metro leader for the Minnesota chapter of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, putting her on one end of the political divide that once again opened up after 17 people were killed in last week's school shooting in Florida. Since then, the national debate over how to stop school shootings has dominated social media posts, news cycles and coffeehouse conversations. On Friday, the debate focused on President Donald Trump's call to arm teachers to protect students from mass killers.
While some, including Preese, say absolutely not, others in Minnesota argue it makes perfect sense.
"There's the old saying," said Tom Delaney, who teaches permit-to-carry classes as well as youth firearm safety classes. " 'Why do I carry a gun? Because a police officer is too heavy to carry.' They're always going to take five or 10 minutes before they get there, and by that time it's usually all over."
Arming teachers, staff or volunteers who are trained would be a good idea, he said. "It certainly can't hurt."
Times have changed, Delaney added. "It's a crazy world," he said. "This stuff never happened 30 years ago."
In Osseo, school board chairman Robert Gerhart floated the idea last week that armed volunteers who are 21 and older and have a permit to carry a weapon could patrol the school halls.