This year marks the 15th anniversary of "Titanic," and this month makes it 100 years since the Titanic sank on April 15, 1912. To commemorate these anniversaries, the 1997 film is being reissued to theaters in 3-D on Wednesday.
It's a good time to revisit the picture, which I did for the first time since 1997. Some things got worse with the years and some got better, but -- here's the good news -- the things that got worse got only slightly worse, and the things that got better got a lot better.
Here are 10 points to look for when you rewatch "Titanic":
1. No "the": Yes, the ship was called "Titanic," but nobody has ever called it anything but "the Titanic," for the simple reason that using an adjective as a noun without "the" just strikes the ear as odd. But in the film, nobody says the "the." It's an affectation that calls attention to itself.
2. Seesaw script: Cameron is a frustrating writer. He comes up with moments that are perfectly lovely, and then in other places, his script clunks. The first meeting of Rose (Kate Winslet) and Jack (Leonardo DiCaprio) is weak and clichéd, and whenever we join them mid-conversation, it feels awkward. He also can't resist moments of too-obvious irony, as when Rose's evil fiancé (Billy Zane) says, "Picasso -- he won't amount to a thing."
3. Labor of love: Celine Dion's rendition of "My Heart Will Go On" was heard so often in the late '90s that it quickly became the stuff of parody. In fact, the theme music is used beautifully throughout. It's a real asset to the picture.
4. Homework assignment: See the 1958 film "A Night to Remember." It's not a movie about the Titanic; it's a love story set on the Titanic. If you don't get into the love story, you will hate the movie. So pay attention to the love story and stop waiting for the iceberg. It's a long wait.
5. Lovely Leo: If you want to get into the love story of "Titanic," DiCaprio is your way in. I failed to appreciate him in 1997, but he is wonderful -- charming and self-assured, with many fine moments.