Donald Trump, we've often been reminded, lacks a proper respect for "experts." In one arena after another, he also recklessly refuses to "follow the science."
Often enough, this has been a serious problem for America under Trump. Then again, consider the curious case of Trump's surprisingly respectable showing in last week's slow motion election results.
Most of the expert political analysis and most of the scientific polling had forecast a more thumping repudiation of this ill-mannered president than American voters delivered.
Expertise and science, disobeyed again.
In politics as in war, to be sure, there is no substitute for victory, and victory has eluded Trump (though of course he won't go quietly, or with dignity).
But merely by performing well enough to help Republicans apparently keep majority control of the Senate and hold or even improve their minority position in the House, Trump may have helped prevent the sort of rushed enactment of a sweeping woke "new deal" agenda that has been filling the dreams of leftists and the nightmares of grown-ups of all ages.
And there's another sense in which this may be a rare case where coming close counts for something. Trump is on track to win, in defeat, more Electoral College votes than all but two of the past 10 losing presidential hopefuls — and far more than were carried by the first George Bush and Jimmy Carter, the last two ousted incumbents.
Joe Biden, as has been widely noted, easily received the most popular votes of any presidential candidate in history last week. Trump easily got the second most in history.