Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
Our state’s economy matters to each of us, from families grappling with increasing costs to businesses trying to attract workers and grow. While a robust, diverse economy like Minnesota’s can’t be truncated to “good” or “bad,” there are factors that define our relative strength.
Rankings are a popular way to try to make sense of these factors. One oft-quoted ranking is CBNC’s “Top States for Business,” which lists Minnesota as sixth in the nation this year. It’s popular because it’s simple and seemingly positive for our state. But that’s also what makes it misleading.
CNBC prioritizes certain quality of life measures — including social policies — over fundamental measurements of economic strength. And oversimplified data doesn’t account for contradictions. Even CNBC gave Minnesota a “C+” for business-friendliness. How can Minnesota be the sixth best state for business, but also be near the bottom for GDP growth (45th), job growth (39th) and net domestic migration (43rd)?
A more accurate and productive interpretation of the economy must focus on performance and growth. A good business climate is one that grows businesses, fosters innovation, builds a pipeline of talent and keeps tax, cost and regulatory burdens in check. Minnesota has a strong legacy of innovation. It’s highly developed and diverse. But it’s slow-growing, and this is cause for concern.
A strong past
In the second half of the 20th century, Minnesota transformed from a largely agricultural-based economy to a modern diversified economy with leading Fortune 500 companies, advanced industry clusters, high innovation rates and one of the nation’s most educated and skilled workforces. Meanwhile, the state’s traditional manufacturing and natural resource-based industries successfully navigated the forces of globalization, finding ways to compete in a global economy.
This decadeslong process left Minnesota with a combination of strengths in the overall quality and assets of its economy. Rankings like CNBC rely heavily on these factors, but they point backward. They tell us what we’ve built, not what we’re building.