The explosive legal case against Vikings star Adrian Peterson was laid out Saturday in Texas, making it clear that the running back will have to convince a jury that whipping his son was "reasonable discipline."
The outline of the case — coming as the National Football League, the Vikings and Minnesota still were reeling from the news — left it unclear when or whether Peterson would play again, and it ignited an intense national debate among fans and parents about the appropriateness and limits of corporal punishment.
Phil Grant, a Montgomery County (Texas) assistant district attorney, said that a single grand jury had considered the case and decided that Peterson's treatment of his son was "not reasonable.''
"Obviously, parents are entitled to discipline their children as they see fit, except for when that discipline exceeds what the community would say is reasonable," Grant said. "[But] the mental state that's reflected in the indictment is that he did so with criminal negligence, or recklessly."
Grant, speaking at a short news conference, said Peterson might not face trial until next year. If convicted, the Vikings star could face up to two years in a Texas jail and a $10,000 fine. The single-page indictment, handed out at Grant's briefing, charged Peterson with one count of injury to a child.
Peterson's first court date has not been set.
For its part, the NFL had little to say about the case.
NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said the league was reviewing Peterson's case to check for violations of its personal conduct policy. The policy would seem to give the NFL wide latitude to act — it says that criminal activity "is clearly outside the scope of permissible conduct," and that discipline also can be imposed for "conduct that imposes inherent danger to the safety and well being" of another individual.