Minneapolis voters would decide in November whether to eliminate the City Charter's requirement for police staffing and replace it with a new department "to provide for community safety and violence prevention," under a proposal floated Friday by five City Council members.
The announcement comes at a time when council members are facing pressure to explain their plan to "begin the process of ending" the Minneapolis Police Department following George Floyd's death.
The council and a separate body, the Minneapolis Charter Commission, would need to work under an expedited schedule as they face a tight deadline to add items to the November ballot. The city's charter, in essence its constitution, requires the City Council to fund a minimum number of police officers.
Council Member Jeremiah Ellison said he still expects to spend a year seeking feedback from residents about how they want to change the Minneapolis Police Department, but he fears that if that charter provision isn't removed, it will hamper their efforts.
"Without it, we can't actually have an earnest yearlong conversation with community that will mean anything," Ellison said. "And by making this change, it doesn't eliminate the police. … Until we have an emergency response system that is ready to deploy, we're going to have police in its place."
Minneapolis' charter requires the City Council to "fund a police force of at least 0.0017 employees per resident, and provide for those employees' compensation." Based on the latest census data, that amounts to roughly 730 police employees. The department had 892 sworn officers and 175 non-sworn employees at the beginning of the month.
During Friday's council meeting, Ellison and four other members — Alondra Cano, Cam Gordon, Steve Fletcher and Council President Lisa Bender — announced plans to introduce on June 26 a plan to amend the City Charter. Their proposal would remove the police department requirement and create a new department "to provide for community safety and violence prevention."
Gordon said they have discussed possibilities but haven't yet settled on the wording of the measure. "I don't know that there is necessarily a consensus among the authors," he said.