Jack Suttor, in his Marine Corps sweatshirt, stood outside under a deep blue sky, the leaves exploding with autumn color, but he looked saddened when he talked about the upcoming election.
"I got turned off by politics, to be honest," he said to Ginny Klevorn, a first-time DFL candidate who was hoping to get his vote in her battleground state House race.
Suttor had already voted, leaving much of the ballot blank.
Klevorn wished him well, checked her list and moved along in the older subdivision in Plymouth. For weeks, Klevorn has spent her days and nights methodically working her way through legislative district 44a, the once solidly Republican suburban area where she hopes to topple Rep. Sarah Anderson, R-Plymouth, a powerful committee chairwoman running for a sixth term.
The battle for controlling the Minnesota House is being fought largely in the suburbs. Outside a handful of districts in greater Minnesota that are in play, Republicans control the state's rural areas, while the DFL has a solid lock on the Twin Cities.
That leaves the suburbs: Once the site of nuclear families but which now are home to young couples with more liberal social views as well as megachurches, fourth-generation Minnesotans and new immigrants, commuters and telecommuters and stay-at-home moms and dads.
The stakes of about a dozen suburban races are significant: If DFLers can flip seven districts, they will control the House after losing it in 2014. If they retain control of the Senate, DFL Gov. Mark Dayton will have fewer obstacles for an agenda that includes universal pre-kindergarten, a robust transportation plan backed by a gas tax increase and new employer mandates like a higher minimum wage and paid family leave.
If Republicans can keep the House and possibly win control of the Senate, they can thwart Dayton initiatives and be better able to drive down taxes and government spending.