Descendants of some late University of Minnesota leaders involved in a debate about renaming campus buildings are going on the offensive, saying the process excluded their voices and unfairly maligned their relatives.
On Friday, several university regents echoed those concerns with sharply worded rebukes of the process so far. A majority on the board wants to see more research before its members make a decision about renaming Coffman Memorial Union and three other buildings, said its chairman, David McMillan.
Last week, President Eric Kaler tentatively recommended that the university's governing board strip the names of the former administrators from campus buildings because they backed policies that segregated student housing or targeted Jews at the U. His proposal seconded the recommendations of a university task force's 125-page report as well as calls by student leaders to rename Coffman.
Kaler said a key next step would be hearing from families of the former U leaders, in an effort that could set a high-stakes precedent at the U, which has never renamed a building for historical reasons.
Some regents questioned if the task force, made up largely of U faculty, had omitted crucial exonerating evidence or read too much into documents.
"I want to make sure we don't sacrifice fairness and integrity to reach an end in support of other values that are very prescient right now," said Regent Darrin Rosha.
But a couple of regents praised the task force's report as thorough and fair. Abdul Omari said it offers compelling evidence of overt discrimination by the four men in the 1930s and '40s: former U presidents Lotus Coffman and Walter Coffey, former Dean Edward Nicholson and former Comptroller and Vice President William Middlebrook.
"I don't see a context or a time in which that is OK," he said.