Former Minneapolis police officer Thomas Lane should stand trial as an accomplice to the murder of George Floyd because his actions during Floyd's May 25 arrest meet the legal requirements for the charges against him, and jurors should be allowed to determine whether he is guilty, prosecutors argue in new legal filings.
Lane's actions when he and three other former officers restrained Floyd showed that he recognized they were inflicting harm, and that the senior officer, Derek Chauvin, was violating police training and policies, prosecutors wrote in a brief made public Tuesday.
The prosecutors said that Lane continued to participate in the risky restraint even after Floyd complained that police were killing him.
The fact that Lane had less than a week of experience on the job is no excuse, they continued. "[F]or a host of important reasons, there is no free pass under state law for rookies who choose to disregard their training at the suggestion of a senior officer."
And according to the motion submitted late Monday by Assistant Attorney General Matthew Frank and Neal Katyal, a special attorney for the state, Lane had extensive police training before he started the job.
Their comments were meant to refute a motion to dismiss the charges, filed in July by Lane's attorney, Earl Gray. He noted that Lane had been on the job for four days when Floyd was killed, arguing that he bore no liability because he was deferring to Chauvin, a senior officer with 19 years of experience.
Gray noted that Lane had expressed concerns about Floyd's struggles to breathe as the officers pinned him on his stomach in the street. Lane had asked Chauvin about rolling Floyd onto his side but was rebuffed, Gray argued.
"It's not a case where he's standing by watching another cop pound on somebody's head," Gray said in early July. "This is a case where my client twice — twice — asked if we should turn him over and the answer from [Chauvin] was no."