Opinion editor's note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
On Monday, a lawsuit was filed against the Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) for the district's recent agreement with the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers (MFT) to prevent teachers of color and Indigenous teachers from being released by their school or the district due to budget cuts ("Suit calls new MPS contract racist," front page, Aug. 24). These protections for teachers of color are important because teachers of color and Indigenous teachers positively affect all students — students of color, Indigenous students and white students alike.
Sixty-three percent of MPS students are of color, but people of color and Indigenous people make up only 18% of licensed teachers.
Protections are needed because:
- A diverse teaching staff improves outcomes for all students.
- MPS has one of the worst achievement gaps in the nation, and teachers of color help students stay, and help them learn.
- While MPS has increased the hiring of teachers of color significantly (by 30%) in the last few years, those teachers are the first to be cut because of lack of tenure when budget cuts happen.
- Students repeatedly ask for teachers who look like them and understand their cultural background.
Protections for teachers of color and Indigenous teachers from budget cuts is about preserving a diverse teaching workforce that represents the population of students. Both district and union leaders agreed that this was a priority and the best way forward. The protections are not a point of controversy in Minneapolis.
These protections are in place to prevent teachers from underrepresented groups from being forced to leave because of budget cuts. They do not preclude any teacher from being released because of performance or conduct.
We at the Advancing Equity Coalition, a multicultural, multiracial group focused on education justice in Minneapolis, led an advocacy effort in support of these protections because we know the district cannot afford to lose any diversity among its current teachers.