In early January, leaders of more than 20 local for-profit corporations gathered at the State Capitol with then-Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie to become public benefit corporations — the first companies in Minnesota to legally declare their decisions will contemplate public good as well as profit.
Businesses that advance the common good aren't new — Minnesota businesses have long led the charge to further corporate responsibility to the community in addition to advancing their business goals. Today, however, there is a new generation of businesses that wish to commit themselves even more deliberately and transparently to advancing a specific public good.
Minnesota joins 26 other states in creating the legal framework to support these public benefit corporations by adjusting existing corporation statutes.
Traditionally, for-profit entities have been required by corporate law to do one thing: maximize shareholder value and profits. This narrow purpose can limit a board of directors' behavior in taking public benefit into account, particularly when it is perceived to be at odds with maximizing shareholder value. But under the new Minnesota law, any company that declares itself a public benefit corporation is free to — and indeed required to — also contemplate its self-declared "public benefit" when making business decisions.
A "public benefit" is a term open to interpretation. It might be promoting economic opportunity for individuals or communities beyond job creation. It might be improving the health of employees and local communities, promoting the arts and sciences or choosing to work with public benefit-driven nonprofits. A public benefit corporation may even translate "public benefit" as hiring and working with low-income and underserved individuals or communities. Regardless of how the business chooses to define "public benefit," it must report its efforts at the year's end.
There's no tax benefit, they won't receive any special government treatment and there's no legal recourse if they fail. It's just a public, transparent declaration.
Why bother then?
First off, there is a legal upside to becoming a public benefit corporation. Under traditional corporate statutes, the pursuit of social or environmental goals potentially exposes corporate directors to the risk of lawsuits from shareholders interested in profits alone. As a public benefit corporation, such lawsuits could be warded off more easily so long as the public benefit corporation can show it was acting with due care in following its public benefit mission.
While time will tell, from a legal standpoint, public benefit corporation status will likely act as a rudder for shareholders and leadership. They will be well served to remember that, at the year's end, it could be detrimental to business if they have ignored their mission. The genius of public benefit corporation status is that it serves to affect the behavior of a corporation in favor of advancing a public benefit without fear of shareholder backlash or lawsuits.