Opinion editor's note: Editorials represent the opinions of the Star Tribune Editorial Board, which operates independently from the newsroom.
•••
As it struggles to continue turning the corner on crime, Minnesota desperately needs a substantial infusion to its public safety efforts on all fronts, from crime prevention to enforcement of laws to the judiciary and corrections.
This year's public safety bill answers many of those needs. Well-balanced among prevention, enforcement and accountability, it features, most notably, sensible gun reforms that focus on expanding background checks — critical to determining those who should not have access to firearms — and a red-flag law that would give hope at last to those who want to keep firearms out of the hands of loved ones struggling with mental illness.
These two provisions have a long, contentious history in this state and have been debated fruitlessly for years, all while gun violence here and across the country has continued to mount. Neither will fully solve this society's gun violence problem, but both are needed responses.
For too long the Legislature has been out of step with Minnesotans, who have shown overwhelming and consistent support for extending background checks to private gun sales. In a recent KSTP-TV poll, 74% of Minnesotans supported such background checks, with only 21% disapproving.
Red-flag laws, known also as extreme risk protection orders, also have majority support, and other states have preceded Minnesota in adopting such laws. Sen. Ron Latz, DFL-St. Louis Park and chairman of the judiciary committee, said the law holds exceptional potential to reduce the rate of suicide by firearm in this state. "I have been working on these [provisions] for 20 years," he said in a news conference held before Friday's vote. "We have extensive and wide-ranging discussions, an extensive process and the final product is better for that."
The red-flag law, he said, "will provide a path forward for someone exhibiting signs of crisis and danger and provide lawful tools to separate those individuals from the firearms around them." Such a path has not existed before now, he said, "and that has been frustrating for law enforcement and for families." Latz noted the bill requires full due process for those under such orders, which must be approved by a judge.