Since Europeans began settling in Minnesota, about half of the state's wetlands have disappeared. But in recent years, the state has stopped the loss and actually gained a few acres, according to data released last month.
Quality is another matter.
"From a strict acreage standpoint, Minnesota is holding steady and maybe even gaining small amounts of wetlands, but there's some concern with the type changes," said Steve Kloiber, monitoring coordinator at the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. "Not all wetlands are the same, and they don't have the same functions."
From 2006 to 2014, Minnesota gained just barely more wetland acreage than it lost, according to data the DNR published in September.
Perhaps the most visible function of wetlands is providing habitat for birds, amphibians, insects, fish and other animals. Wetlands also refresh groundwater supplies, cleaning the water that flows through them. They can even act as giant sponges, sucking up extra water during heavy rains and reducing flood peaks.
One factor that may have exacerbated flooding in Houston during Hurricane Harvey was the amount of impervious surfaces — concrete, asphalt and roofs that don't absorb rainfall. The impervious area of metro Houston increased by about one-third from 2001 to 2011, the latest available data, according to a Bloomberg report. During that same time, the impervious area grew by 15 percent in the Twin Cities' seven-county metro.
Now, any city would have trouble with the 50 or so inches of rain Harvey brought to Houston, but limiting both wetlands loss and growth of impervious area could help.
Minnesota started monitoring wetlands in 2006 to study the effect of 1991 legislation meant to stanch their loss, looking at both their quantity and quality.