When school started last fall, University of Minnesota student-teachers working at Global Academy, a K-8 charter school in New Brighton, asked Global’s teachers to list their hopes for them.
“I said ‘I want them to stay in education,’ because there’s such a shortage of teachers,” said Rachel Enderlein, who has taught kindergartners and first-graders at Global since graduating from the U 16 years ago.
“They were kind of shocked when I said that to them,” she added. “I just said, ‘I want you to see what is doable and to find that love of teaching that we have found.’”
I’ve visited some charter schools in recent months to learn how they sparked competition in public education, and how they affect Minnesota’s economy. I’ll write more about them in coming weeks. Global stands out because of how it is run.
A distinctive element of the 1991 law that created charter schools in Minnesota was that a majority of seats on their governing boards had to be given to licensed teachers working in the school. That changed in 2009, and many charter schools are now led by boards with a mix of administrators, parents and community members, looking more like the elected school boards of public school districts.
Global’s nine-person governance board is still controlled by its teachers.
“You can’t replace a teacher’s knowledge for knowing what’s best for a school. So we stay as a teacher-majority board and will always be that way as far as I’m concerned,” said Melissa Storbakken, who co-founded Global in 2006, worked for many years as a teacher and became its executive director last fall.
Each summer, Global’s teachers meet to revisit and reconsider what they call the “essential agreements” for running the school. They cover not just big things like the curriculum but smaller details like how students move through the building, which is quiet with teachers using hand signals and signboards to direct them.