Opinion editor's note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
It is time to move forward on ranked-choice voting to reduce polarization and extremism in our politics.
I'm proud of Minnesota's national leadership when it comes to voting. We are the "North Star State" when it comes to advancing democracy, and ranked-choice voting will continue this leadership tradition. As a former secretary of state, I know we have the expertise needed to implement this promising reform in Minnesota.
Ranked-choice voting is a proven system designed to make us a more perfect union. It is already used for local elections in some of Minnesota's most populated areas, like Bloomington, Minnetonka, St. Louis Park, Minneapolis and St. Paul.
Also known as instant runoff voting, ranked-choice voting allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference. When the votes are counted, if no one has earned a majority, the candidate with the fewest first-choice votes is eliminated, and votes received by that candidate are reallocated to their voters' second-choice candidates. This process continues until one candidate has a majority.
Under our current system, candidates can win with only a small percentage of the vote, even when the majority would have preferred someone else. Ranked-choice voting makes elections more efficient because the instant runoff occurs in one cost-effective election. At the local level, ranked-choice voting can eliminate the need for a primary, allowing for a single election in November when turnout is much higher. In state partisan primaries and general elections, ranked-choice voting can achieve majority winners without costly runoffs like those that sometimes occur in Georgia, which can result in steep declines in participation.
Some worry that this approach may be confusing, but our experience here in Minnesota and in other states shows otherwise. Voters in 60 jurisdictions across the country, including five Minnesota cities and the states of Maine and Alaska, are already using this approach. Millions of voters overwhelmingly find this system simple to use and prefer it over the traditional system. Like Maine and Alaska, Minnesota can educate its voters about the system, and the bill moving through the Legislature provides an appropriation for that purpose.