Lt. Bob Kroll, head of the Police Officers Federation of Minneapolis, is a shining example of exactly what is wrong with policing in 2020 ("Kroll, Minneapolis police union head, blasts city's riot response in letter to officers," StarTribune.com, June 1). In a letter to union membership shared by the media on Monday, he quickly and repeatedly attempted to remove any culpability from himself and his brethren and rather placed it at the feet of city politicians, Minneapolis citizens and even George Floyd — going so far as to say the four terminated officers lost their jobs without "due process."
The "us vs. them" position presented by Kroll is supremely emblematic of the existing underlying issues with the city police, which culminated the past week in unprecedented civil unrest. It also demonstrates an unwillingness to engage in the type of community policing that will be needed in order to restore the city's faith in the department.
While the Police Officers Federation of Minneapolis is a private group and is free to elect its leaders as it likes, the collective bargaining agreement between the Police Officers Federation and the city of Minneapolis expired on Dec. 31, 2019.
I call upon the mayor and City Council to communicate to the Police Officers Federation that no future agreement shall be ratified until Kroll resigns from his leadership position within the union.
Archie Pickerign, St. Paul
• • •
In many ways state Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka, a Republican, was right when he said that what we're witnessing now is "a failure of leadership." But it's a leadership failure of historical proportions, not simply a recent failure. It's a failure of leadership to provide equality in education, equality in opportunity, equality in wealth and income. It's a failure of leadership to provide early child education, affordable child care and access to affordable health care. It's incumbent upon Gazelka and his fellow legislators to step up and provide leadership that leads to greater equality, not partisan posturing and benefits simply to those who already occupy positions of privilege.
John E. Fredell, Minneapolis
POLICING BY CONSENT
Unworkable with so many guns
The letter in Monday's paper, "Rethink our policing model," made some "policing by consent" comparisons with other countries. The London example of many police officers without guns relying on the community's trust for their authority sounds wonderful. There is one major difference between England and the United States. Our reality is a culture of guns and violence.
England has 4.6 guns per 100 residents. The U.S. has 120 guns per 100 residents. Similarly, the number of police officers killed in Britain, a country with about a fifth the population of the U.S., is less than three per year. We average about 150 per year.
Being a police officer is a dangerous and highly stressful job, and the vast majority deserve our respect and thanks. This does not excuse over-the-top violence by the officers who are paid to protect us. However, until we change our irrational infatuation with guns, I am afraid that policing by consent is a pie-in-the-sky concept.