Michael Bredeson ("Life after ethanol: Are we prepared?" June 6) warns us that the use of corn to make fuel may be coming to an end, and he wisely recommends that we plan for that eventuality before it happens.
The problem of overproduction in agriculture has been around for a long time. Farmers were burying pigs rather than taking them to market during the Great Depression. Seventy years ago, the United States had a farm program that included quotas for production; price supports, with the government buying up surplus agricultural products, and the Soil Bank Program that paid farmers to take land out of production. That program was scrapped, and now farmers are encouraged to maximize production even when prices fall. This has led to a high-intensity agriculture that farms every last inch of a field and uses heavy fertilization to maximize yields. A result is too much corn, and a secondary problem is water contamination.
Turning corn into fuel is not a sustainable answer. We need to consider taking land out of use and decreasing the intensity of fertilization of the land still in use. This will have the added benefit of improving ground water in our rural areas that is being contaminated with nitrates. We did it before; we can do it again. It requires the will to make the change.
Martin Urberg, Edina
•••
In Bredeson's article on the Opinion Exchange page last Sunday, I found out that so many electric cars will soon be bought that many ethanol farmers may take a big financial hit. Yet, a very short time ago the Star Tribune was printing stories and letters about car dealers being forced to have electric cars on their lots that they wouldn't be able to sell. This could be a case of two cars chained together but going in opposite directions.
Del Grote, Maplewood
DEFENSE SPENDING
Impressed with McCollum, and wishing her and others wisdom
We were pleased to read the article describing U.S. Rep. Betty McCollum's involvement with the Defense Department ("Pressed on all sides," June 6). Over the years we have been impressed with her ability to see the ramifications of an issue beyond the topic in question. It raises hope that House committee members and Defense Department would factor in the influence of such things as climate change when allocating resources. Too often, it seems the allure of a new weapon system leads to cost overruns and failed expectations when the planes or ships do not live up to the defense contractors' promises. We anticipate that McCollum would demand guarantees that the defense costs are for needed equipment rather than another case of "political engineering" leading to failed combat readiness.