•••
On Friday morning we saw a mug shot of a former U.S. president, and it is the face of a petulant child determined to ruin the family's Christmas photo. As he has always been hyperaware of images and the use of media, I am not surprised that the face in this mug shot is one that seems practiced. It is like everything else in the media touched by this particular spin-monger: performative and disingenuous. It is no accident that the face we see is glowering, vindictive one. Just like the little boy in the Christmas card, he's determined to communicate his displeasure and voice a passive, feckless protest. What is that protest? What does he choose to take a stand on? He's shared it in the first post of his newly reinstated Twitter/X account, the mug shot with the caption "Never surrender." Since the photo is taken at the moment of a literal surrender, the "hold my breath" peevishness of the posture seems even more ridiculous. But, if it is childish, it also is the face for the anger and grievance that has fueled his rise as a demagogue. It is the face of a child, who even when confronted with his own foolishness, chooses to "never surrender," not back down, and punish everyone with his performative rage. If we allow that angry child to do so, he will create enough noise to destroy everything around him.
The one-time president is now a four-times-indicted candidate, and he will raise money and create buzz with this image. It will be on T-shirts, marketing emails, lawn signs and banners in the year ahead and will literally be waved as a standard to rally behind. But if it is published and repeated, it is marketing and not policy. It will excite and anger many, but offer no hope — only the opportunity for some to "hold their breath" alongside an angry child.
The great weight of our times is to be careful to not mistake this peevishness for courage; to not mistake theatrics for governance; and to not let rage and noise replace our honest need for ideas and vision. We cannot allow an angry child to do that.
Michael Whistler, Minneapolis
•••
The Aug. 23 Star Tribune carried an article announcing Trump's proposed "ring around the U.S. economy" universal tariff of a flat 10% on all goods coming into and purchased by U.S. consumers ("Trump vows major new tariffs if elected"). Trump is off the mark, of course, but that is not announcing anything new about him. It appears doubtful that he really knows what a U.S. tariff is. He talks as if it would be paid by the foreign companies who bring their goods into the U.S. That is not the case. A tariff imposed by the U.S. government on such goods is actually a tax imposed on the U.S. purchasers who buy such products.