•••
St. Paul's guaranteed-income program, the People's Prosperity Pilot, showed how much better life could be for low-income families with an extra $500/month ("High marks for guaranteed cash," front page, and "Positive results from guaranteed income," editorial, Dec. 27). The news article talked about benefits to recipient families: improved ability to cover a $400 expense, having money saved, having higher levels of employment, a positive outlook on life. It even talked about savings to government: a slight decrease in Social Security payment to a child whose parent earns more than before the pilot.
"Republicans [however] say that such programs 'place an unsustainable burden on taxpayers and hinder economic prosperity,' said Anna Mathews, executive director of the Minnesota GOP." What's not mentioned is the substantial savings in the cost of local public services: social workers to handle family crises, the court system to adjudicate child neglect and abuse cases, police to respond to family issues, losses from petty crime caused by lack of money. I speculate that $500 a month saves the public purse more than $500 in services not needed.
When your city or county proposes a guaranteed-income program, support it based on financial and humanitarian considerations.
Elaine Frankowski, Minneapolis
PEDESTRIAN DEATHS
Broader considerations
"Why are so many pedestrians [hit by vehicles and] dying at night?" (Nation & World, Dec. 27.) Driver distraction is probably the obvious reason for the rise in these fatalities, but it would have been constructive to list some defensive techniques.
In addition to avoiding distractions, drivers can always drive with headlights on so that their vehicles are more visible to pedestrians and other drivers. The difference becomes more obvious as we age.