•••
After 6 million Jews were slaughtered during World War II, the Jewish people needed a safe haven. Though, in retrospect, it might not have been a wise decision, they were gifted the state of Israel. One tiny strip of land, where they could live their lives in relative safety.
Clearly, that goal has not been met. As it stands now, it is, perhaps, the least safe place one could be on this planet.
Is it possible to share this land? Well, yes, of course. But who, realistically, needs a safe haven? Christians, who are in the majority in the majority of nations around the world? Clearly not. And they seem perfectly content with Israel being run by Jews (as their own savior was a Jew himself).
How about Muslims? Let's look at the details of where Muslims are essentially safe (except for the fact that different sects choose to go to war with one another ... but that's a different story):
- Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Mauritania and Yemen are all Islamic states.
- Though not "Islamic states," per se, in Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Kuwait, Algeria, Malaysia, Maldives, Morocco, Libya, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, Somalia and Brunei, Islam is the state religion.
- Though there is no state religion in Niger, Indonesia, Sudan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sierra Leone and Djibouti, the population is overwhelmingly Muslim.
- And, while there's a separation between church and state in Albania, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Chad, Gambia, Guinea, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kyrgyzstan, Mali, Northern Cyprus, Nigeria, Senegal, Syria, Lebanon, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Turkey and Uzbekistan, the majority of their populations are also Muslim.
(My source for these details is WorldAtlas.com.)
That's a very long list. So do Muslims need yet one more nation to call home? Clearly not. But needing it and wanting it are two separate things, aren't they?