•••
As an angler, I understand why some sturgeon fishers are concerned by the possibility of these irreplaceable fish getting Endangered Species Act protections (“State’s sturgeon fishery awaits federal decision,” April 12). But without these safeguards, the lake sturgeon’s future is bleak — and a listing wouldn’t end sturgeon fishing, as the law allows for sustainable harvest.
While lake sturgeon in some areas are doing better than others, only nine lake sturgeon populations with more than 1,000 adult fish remain. Lake sturgeon once thrived throughout the Great Lakes and the Mississippi River basin. But these once-abundant fish have suffered a 90% range-wide decline since the late 1800s.
In Minnesota, the Rainy River/Lake of the Woods population is robust, with recent counts of around 100,000 fish, and recently the Ottertail River saw the first sturgeon spawning in 125 years. But throughout their range, lake sturgeon remain in trouble.
Concerned with low overall numbers, the Center for Biological Diversity, where I work, petitioned to protect lake sturgeon as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act. This would allow the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to rank each population’s health. Based on those rankings, the agency would have the flexibility to assign different levels of protection.
We all want the same thing — waters teeming with abundant lake sturgeon and a future where sustainable sturgeon fishing thrives. A federal listing would provide a range-wide recovery plan and ongoing federal funding. It’s the only way to ensure a comeback for the cherished lake sturgeon.
Margaret E. Townsend, Portland, Ore.