VIKINGS STADIUM
For revenues, a roof is a community necessity
What are Republican leaders thinking, taking the roof off the proposed stadium? I'm a Republican, and I'm embarrassed -- for them! The whole point of investing tax dollars in this structure is to receive some additional revenue throughout the year, not just from the 10 games from August through January.
Bringing in additional events (the Super Bowl, the Final Four, monster truck pulls, concerts) guarantees additional revenue in the form of tourism and jobs. Why would they eliminate this stream?
I prefer my tax dollars to go to the stadium, since it is an investment in our community and not, say, a study of deformed frogs (which, thankfully, has been discontinued) or light-rail transit that serves a fraction of our population.
Why do they choose now to play hardball on something so important to our state when we needed them for other stupefying bills that have been passed? Put the roof on and get this done as planned!
LORIE COUSINEAU, MEDINA
• • •
To read and hear the hoopla over the recent proposal to finance a football stadium without a roof, one might think a city can't have a popular and successful football team if it has to play in the cold. Tell that to the Packers, the Patriots, the Steelers, the Bears.
DAVID MORRIS, MINNEAPOLIS