•••
Regarding downtown Minneapolis and its future: Lots of people are painting a rosy picture of not only the present situation but the future ("New ideas, new spirit needed downtown," editorial, Dec. 16, and "Downtown will thrive in new ways," Opinion Exchange, Dec. 14). They're saying the downturn is temporary, that COVID or the lack of workers returning to the office are largely to blame.
But according to the Downtown Council, there are 56,077 people residing downtown, in an area that Google says encompasses about 3 square miles. By comparison, there are 59,141 people living in Mankato/North Mankato, Minn., in an area of 26.18 square miles. Mankato/North Mankato supports hundreds of businesses of every type. Yes, Mankato is a college town and regional hub that attracts shoppers from the surrounding area, but so too is Minneapolis and its parks, museums, stadiums, theaters, colleges and such.
So why can't 56,000 people living in a small footprint of 3 square miles — 56,000 people who need to eat, shop and be entertained, along with thousands of workers and visitors — support even a tiny fraction of the businesses that Mankato does? Could there be something else at play the downtown boosters can't see (or admit) through their rose-colored glasses?
If they aren't willing to take a hard look at the facts, then they are doomed to watch the continued decline of what was until fairly recently a city to be proud of.
John Morgan, Burnsville
•••