Emily Otiso, a mixed-race scientist and medical student, said the truth in the Aug. 16 article "Small slights add up in 'Minnesota Nice.' " The phrase is supercilious, and people who use it convey that intent, whether they understand it or not. Unbeknown to Otiso, it's not particularly racist.
A worthy character trait, tolerance, was a quality brought to America in abundance by Scandinavian immigrants. That patience is one of the seven heavenly virtues. Somehow, the attribute was diffused and muddied into something different, is my guess, and was dubbed as a special quality of Minnesota people. What nonsense.
A large percentage of Scandinavian Americans are Protestants. With respect for that belief system, I'd never heard the idiom before I went to college in-state, and categorized it as a folksy belittling term developed from that root. My descendance is Irish/French/Catholic/white and metro Minnesota born and bred.
Also, women in medical school are treated to sexism, humiliation, patriarchal disapproval from their educators. If you don't know this, read Dr. Pamela Wilbe's book "Physician Suicide Letters," about medicine's biases. I hope Ms. Otiso's and all women's experiences in medical school will offer less faculty degradation and more tolerance to them.
Eugénie de Rosier, St. Paul
MINNESOTA POLL
Here, let me write a more reflective headline for you
The StarTribune.com headline "Poll: Cuts to Minneapolis police ranks lack majority support" (Aug. 15), while technically correct, inaccurately slants the article toward a negative view of police funding cuts. A better headline would be "Poll: Minneapolis residents are divided on reducing the ranks of police." A 44%-to-40% difference is a close split, practically within the survey's margin of error.
An even better headline would have been "Shifting funds from police to social services has overwhelming support." This (almost 75% support) is the most definitive finding from the poll. It belongs in the headline. It is a signal that if a shift to social services had been included in the police cuts question, the results would likely have been quite different. Asking about reducing the number of police without any mention of alternative uses of funds or other strategies for community safety, biases the answers toward the negative.
Brett Smith, Minneapolis
• • •
I picked up the print edition of my Sunday Star Tribune to read the following top headline: "No majority for Mpls. police force cuts." The poll cited by the Strib found that "only" 40% of residents support the idea of reducing the size of the Minneapolis Police Department while 44% are opposed.
On Aug. 3, the American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota released a poll survey that it and other groups commissioned that showed that 61% of Minneapolis voters were prepared to vote "yes" to change the Minneapolis City Charter to create a "Community Safety and Violence Prevention Department" and that the number jumped to 70% when asked of Black voters.