•••
In 1981, during Ronald Reagan's first term, a tax cut pushed the national debt over $1 trillion. There was hand-wringing about how this would shackle our children to economic misery. The federal debt is now 34 times that Reagan level ("Fix U.S. budget for short, long term," editorial, Jan. 12). We are now a whole generation removed and supposed to be suffering because of that $1 trillion debt from 40 years ago. Why aren't we? What should we expect of this broken record narrative for the next generation?
The biggest myth is how so many equate deficits to excessive household debt. Very bad analogy. As long as a government has the ability to insert (i.e., spend) its own fiat currency into the economy and redeem debt with that same currency, it can never go broke. All of those federal debt dollars are accelerating around our economy doing all kinds of good stuff. The economy grows and that debt has little effect. Recent recessions are all from external causes like oil shocks, housing market meltdowns, COVID supply-chain collapses, etc. Inflation has always been cost-push (sudden external shortages) not demand-pull (too much money chasing too few goods) from deficits.
There is a school of economics that espouses "Modern Monetary Theory" — the concept that deficit spending is to be encouraged and can do a lot of good if directed well and judiciously applied. I am only an amateur student of this and don't pretend to understand all the intricacies of modern macroeconomics, but it seems we've been doing something akin to what the modern monetary folks have been advocating for quite a while without catastrophe.
The national economy is so huge and complex that no group of economists has it right. But if we could stop wrongly equating the national debt to a private credit card and dump this deficit myth, we can perhaps look at ways the federal government can help the most people with a wise application of its bountiful currency supply.
Dennis Fazio, Minneapolis
•••