On Nov. 8, voters should vote "no" on an amendment to the Minnesota Constitution that would "Remove Lawmakers' Power to Set Their Own Pay." This amendment defines bad governance for several reasons.
The amendment violates one of the foundations of American democracy — the separation of powers. The amendment would form a "independent citizen-only council to prescribe salaries for lawmakers" appointed by the governor and by the chief justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court. Spending money is the task of the Legislature. If legislators want a raise, they have to earn it and justify it to their constituents.
This "council" would be unaccountable to voters, and, by constitutional law, its members must officially belong to the Minnesota Republican Party or the Minnesota DFL Party. The amendment chisels in partisanship in a time when more and more voters identify as independents and empowers these parties even more. How many Minnesota voters are official members of those parties? One hundred? Two hundred? Most Minnesotans would be ineligible to sit on this council.
The slick title of the amendment sounds very enticing to voters who are tired of bad government and overpaid elected officials. But if this amendment passes, those same lawmakers are practically guaranteed a raise.
Mike Kiepe, Minneapolis
IMMIGRANTS AND PUBLIC HOUSING
If they came after persecution, and now are traveling back …
Upon reading the story about how Somalis in Minneapolis get their rent reduced while on trips back to their home country ("Housing board lowers rent for tenants who travel," Sept. 30), I was thinking about why and how they were allowed to enter the U.S. in the first place. There are two definitions, refugees and asylees.
They are basically the same in benefits — allowing legal status with a path to citizenship in the U.S. Refugees are people picked through applications living in a foreign country, while asylees are people who are already inside the U.S.
Both require a substantial fear of persecution from other groups or the government in their nation.
That said, with how the law currently is written, they cannot be sent back to their home country, even if conditions improve, if their political/religious group regains control of the government, etc.