I heartily agree with the sentiments expressed by critics of the state Department of Natural Resources' response to invasive species control ("Mussels' march exasperates lake advocates," Oct. 1). The state is losing the battle that threatens to forever alter Minnesota's lakes.
As an example, I own a cabin on a beautiful, clean and clear lake in central Minnesota. The DNR Aquatic Invasive Species Department previously provided matching-grant assistance to our lake association for inspections, even though the lake has a relatively small public access. They did this because the DNR stocks trout in our lake and actively publicizes the trout fishery, attracting fishermen from across the state. With the expanding zebra-mussel infestations statewide, the DNR can no longer provide matching funds to our organization. We raise funds and provide access inspectors through a private program on weekends and summer holidays. In those inspections, we have learned that the greatest number of access users are trout fishermen and that fully 30 percent of them last boated on zebra-mussel-infested waters (Minnetonka, Mille Lacs, Superior). Letters to local legislators, the DNR commissioner and even the governor's office are ignored. This is only one story and one Minnesota lake. It is difficult not to become cynical about the future of Minnesota's waters.
JOAN STROBEL, St. Paul
SOMALI COMMUNITY
Government help is limited, so look within
Minnesota should be proud that it is home to the United States' largest Somali-American population, which includes some of our most innovative, patriotic and hardworking citizens.
Like any other constituency, however, Minnesota's Somali community has its troublesome constituents, chief among them those recently recruited by the terror organization ISIL. Jamal Abdulahi addressed the dangerous fact that our state has become an incubator for a growing number of radical jihadists and rightly called for quick action to respond ("Somalis in Minnesota: A second chance to get it right," Oct. 1).
Nevertheless, it was unfortunate that he directed his remedies for this radicalization exclusively at government, which, he writes, should do more to "dissuade" interest in extremism. Government is limited in its ability to change the hearts and minds of its citizens.
While federal agencies should do all they can to counter recruitment efforts by terror groups, the "ad campaigns" Abdulahi calls for can only do so much. The government's primary responsibility in this battle is not to "discourage" terrorism, but to terminate it. The main task of federal, state and local government is to capture terrorists and foil their plots.
It is ultimately the responsibility of parents, religious institutions and community leaders such as Abdulahi to expose the lies and false promises of radical Islam. It is friends and family — not federal agents — who can most effectively influence misguided young minds and quash extremism taking root here at home.
ANDY BREHM, Minneapolis
TRANSGENDER STUDENTS