The July 22 Variety section had a lengthy "opinion" article on the proposed new plan for the renovation of Peavey Plaza (on the Nicollet Mall) written by Tom Fisher from the University of Minnesota. The article was very positive in its scope.
As you may recall, the Cultural Landscapes Foundation and the Preservation Alliance of Minnesota successfully sued the city of Minneapolis in 2012 to stop plans to deconstruct this historic 1960s park (subsequently placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 2013) and replace it with a totally new design. Over the past year, the city of Minneapolis has been working with local stakeholders and a new design group on a plan that would maintain key elements of the original park design yet update it to conform to new requirements for handicapped access — the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (http://bit.ly/2tQZcoS) and the Guidelines for the Treatment of Cultural Landscapes (http://bit.ly/2u5BUXE).
However, there is an article on the national website of the Cultural Landscapes Foundation documenting continuing, serious concerns with the new plan of which the public should be aware.
Harvey Ettinger, Minneapolis
MUSLIM PRACTICES
Meat consumption can be halal and humane at the same time
The July 25 article "Somalis make Shakopee home" notes Somali-Americans' need for "halal meats such as chicken legs, diced beef, goat and camel — a Middle Eastern delicacy."
Progressive Muslim communities, with the help of some imams, animal-protection organizations and veterinary expertise, are seeking to ensure that the slaughtering of animals for their consumption is in accord with Muslim beliefs. This movement, begun by the late Al-Hafiz B.A. Masri, an internationally renowned imam and a friend of mine, promotes the adoption of pre-slaughter stunning to render the animals totally unconscious before the blood vessels in their throats are severed with one stroke. This is because of the relatively recent scientific discovery of other blood vessels, especially in young kids and lambs, that are not severed because they course through the neck vertebrae and are protected by the bone.
This means that unconsciousness and death are protracted, because there is still some circulation to the brain. Total decapitation, as I have witnessed with goats being ritually slaughtered by Sikhs, is clearly more humane than traditional halal and kosher slaughter. But decapitating larger animals such as cattle and camels is more problematic.
According to Gail Eisnitz with the Humane Farming Association, "rendering farm animals unconscious prior to bleeding and butchering them is far less inhumane than allowing them to slowly and consciously bleed to death. Stunning also reduces the possibility that the animals have sensibility during the butchering process. We encourage the Muslim community to institute stunning as a routine practice if slaughter is being conducted."
Michael W. Fox, Golden Valley
POLLUTION COSTS
Carbon fee on emissions is still the best way to go
Paul Anton and Phillip Peterson ("Let's update how we tally pollution's costs," Opinion Exchange, July 26) rightfully pointed to the need for the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission to take action to control fossil-fuel pollution that is adversely impacting human health and climate change, as it subsequently did (" 'Social cost' of emissions increased," July 28). While further regulations may have some effect on the fossil-fuel industry, a more likely option involves adoption of a carbon fee on emissions so that the industry is paying for the actual costs of its emissions on human health and climate change. Rather than a government tax, revenue collected from carbon fees would be distributed to the public as well as to the development of alternative, clean-energy options. This free-market approach has increasing support from people across the political spectrum as a means of shifting away from dependency on fossil fuels that is placing the future of the planet in peril.