•••
Recently a friend invited me to fill out a Minnesota Department of Transportation survey for Rethinking I-94. When I went to the website, I was puzzled because it didn't identify an actual problem that needed to be solved. It was an apology for the stupid decision to run the highway through Rondo. (In 75 years, will there be an apology for the stupid decision to wreck Summit Avenue with raised bike trails that are unsafe, especially for the disabled?) The survey lists several rebuild scenarios that increase in complexity, cost and confusion about unknown consequences.
None of their proposals go far enough! So I conjured my own utopian scenario for Interstate 94. Minnesota was originally the bottom of a prehistoric sea. I believe I-94 should be excavated down to the water table to return it to its original seascape. This would dovetail nicely with the native plant movement. DNA obtained from fossils could re-establish ancient seaweed plants. We could also bring back the original inhabitants — see "Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer" from "Saturday Night Live." After the excavation fills with water it will essentially be "at grade." An at-grade seascape would function much like a canal. Millennials could opt to commute in wooden sailing craft instead of gas-guzzling vehicles or bicycles made from materials manufactured with carbon-based energy. (Put on your Go-Pro, bro!) Paths alongside the sea-canal accommodate pedestrians, wheelchairs and donkeys. Donkeys or mules can tow the barges delivering food, etc., between the two cities. The donkey/mule droppings can be composted at City Hall and distributed to homeless encampments for community gardens (equity).
Too bad we can't travel back in time to fix stupid decisions. Maybe it's best to learn from the past and not enable more stupidity such as hiring cronies instead of experts, spending tax dollars on idealistic fever dreams before taking care of basic infrastructure, removing healthy ash trees when there isn't any money to replace them, destroying trees and tree roots with antiquated road construction practices, raising the sales tax in St. Paul and misrepresenting its use, etc., etc., etc.
Alice Gebura, St. Paul
SPEEDING
This is not a focus-group problem
I was glad to hear over 20,000 speeding tickets were issued in July through the state's enforcement campaign ("20K ticketed as speeding hits red zone," Aug. 11). But I was disappointed not to hear more urgency about the increasingly dangerous state of driving in Minnesota, especially on freeways. Speeding is part of it, but in recent years I've also seen big increases in tailgating, cutting others off, swerving between lanes and other kinds of very aggressive driving. I see it now almost every time on the highway, and it's not just speeding.
Neighborhood safety is properly a concern, but safety while driving on the freeway seems to be off the state's radar — except maybe in July. Mike Hanson, director of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety's Office of Traffic Safety, says that "Unacceptable is not a strong enough word" to describe the epidemic of speeding. But he goes on to say, "We can't enforce our way out of this" and cites the state's plans to tackle the problem through surveys, focus groups and outreach.