The Heritage Foundation is at it again, sounding the alarm about the deficit and impending default on U.S. debt. Heritage represents the extreme right in our national discourse — think John Birch Society, Koch Brothers. They periodically ring this bell (though never, of course, when a Republican is in the White House), hoping to persuade people who don't understand their goals. And make no mistake: Their goal is not to protect average Americans. It is to undo the progress made throughout the 20th century in using government to improve the lives of its citizens. Their targets include most of what Americans value deeply: Social Security, Medicare, public schools, effective regulation of industry and commerce, and clean water and air.
They do not ask: What needs do we have that government is in the best position to provide? And then: What's the most efficient, equitable way to pay for these services? They only ask: How can we reduce the size of government to almost nothing, regardless of need or consequences? And they never bring economic theory to bear on this discussion. (Suffice it to say, reputable economists are aware of the size our deficit, and they are not pulling the fire alarm.) And the zealots never, ever contemplate raising revenue — to, say, the levels that prevailed when Dwight Eisenhower was president.
Why the deficit hysteria right now? It's obviously coordinated with House Republicans, who are holding the entire federal government hostage over the dangerous ideas expressed in this deceptive essay. No, it's not my grandfather's federal debt rating. Maybe because it's not my grandfather's beloved Republican Party — that one is as dead as he is.
Stephen Bubul, Minneapolis
There are various ways to manage (manipulate) a news story. Perhaps the most obvious way is by shaping the story's content. Less obvious (but also effective) is the story's placement. A perfect example is the report about the March for Israel in the Nov. 15 edition of the Star Tribune ("March for Israel draws tens of thousands to D.C."). Such a momentous event certainly merited a front-page placement, but the paper placed it on the back page of the main section. Furthermore, the story was placed "below the fold," where it is more likely to be overlooked. Certainly, a story of such unusual national unity, in which Democratic and Republican political leaders even stood hand-in-hand, deserved more favorable attention.