The day of my admission to the U.S. Supreme Court Bar was one of the proudest days of my life. Agree or disagree, I read and honored each opinion of the court as one of the greatest contributions of the founders to democracy. However, the conduct of the current majority of the court leaves me embarrassed and ashamed.
Justice Clarence Thomas' wife actively sought to overturn a democratic election, as shown by e-mails the justice sought to keep from discovery ("Justice's spouse pressed case to overturn election," March 25). Justice Neil Gorsuch speaks as a headliner at right-wing political events. This week, the majority used its shadow docket to summarily reverse Wisconsin's congressional map at the behest of Republicans without so much as an argument. They did so after reversing Alabama's un-gerrymandered map a month earlier because it was too close to the election.
It is patently clear that the current majority is not interpreting the law, but acting as a partisan body motivated solely by political loyalty and personal religious beliefs. What was once the least dangerous but most revered branch of government is really not an independent branch at all. The current majority has rendered it a mere appendage of a political party.
There is no valid reason to refrain from changing the size of the court at this point. Perhaps one day it will be what it once was, rather than a small group using unelected power to undermine democracy to impose minority rule.
Kelly Dahl, Linden Grove Township, St. Louis County
RUSSIA, UKRAINE
Support and complications
"U.S. offers refuge to 100,000 Ukrainians" (front page, March 25). I am glad. For me they are among Emma Lazarus' "homeless" and "tempest-tossed." I am just wondering if we would lift the same "golden lamp" if those fleeing similar carnage were Black, Muslim or non-European.
Gene Friesen, Maple Grove
•••