It's a fall morning on a Friday in Manhattan. You could go into the office for a few token work hours before catching that flight back to MSP, or run for it. Beat the endless line of tour buses just as the Metropolitan Museum of Art opens on the east side of Central Park. So you go, and sprint alone up the grand central stairs knowing exactly where the American Gallery is that displays "Washington Crossing the Delaware."
Having arrived, you now have 20 minutes to sit alone on a bench, staring at that massive painting depicting eventual victory of a revolution over the tyranny of few, through the harshest and humblest of circumstances. But wait. Wait just a second. This prize was painted by a — ahem — German artist, some 70-plus years after the event? How and why is such an iconic American symbol some kind of foreign "import"? Can this be?
The "how and why" is as relevant today as it was in 1851, it turns out. The American experiment in revolution against kings and the tyranny of few inspired Europeans to eventually follow in overthrowing their own despots, then was reflected in their art. And until recently, Americans have continued to serve as world leaders in this regard. Until recently. Our president seems to court despots from North Korea and Russia these days instead, and alienate allied democracies in Canada and Europe. What would this precious artwork look like if painted today, you might ask? I wonder, too.
P.S. You can see the same original work (smaller) in Winona at the Minnesota Marine Art Museum, if you don't believe me about its powerful message of inspiring the world.
Jonathan Hegre, Plymouth
MINNESOTA LOTTERY
Anything goes, now including ease of gambling by app
Less than a month into its debut, a new method of distribution being used by the Minnesota Lottery has yielded its first million-dollar winner, a college millennial ("App was $1M charm for student," July 13). The winner used an online app to acquire the winning ticket, which he got for free for referring friends to the app.
The Minnesota Lottery always has and continues to operate under the belief that anything not prohibited in statute is allowed. However, Minnesota charitable gaming (bingo, pulltabs, raffles) operates under the assumption that anything not allowed in statute is prohibited.
Hopefully the Legislature will address the new method of distribution next session. Having legal gambling available 24/7/365 without ever having to go anywhere needs a thorough vetting before becoming law. In the meantime, the Minnesota Lottery couldn't really buy that kind of publicity, could it?
Allen Lloyd Lund, Maple Grove
The writer is executive director of Allied Charities of Minnesota, a nonprofit trade organization representing licensed gaming.