•••
The attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump marks one of our country’s periodic turns toward its dark side in the form of overt violence against politicians and public servants. While I’m relieved that Trump was not seriously injured, I find the Republican pearl-clutching attributing the shooting to “Democrats’ rhetoric” to be a bit much.
Republican objections center chiefly on characterizing Trump as an authoritarian threat to democracy. Object all you like, but only one major party candidate in the race has suggested suspending the Constitution, being a dictator on day one, implementing mass deportations of immigrants or subjecting critics and political opponents to military tribunals. Only one major party candidate has spent the past eight-plus years trying to discredit and weaken our nation’s elections. As president, that candidate encouraged an attack on the U.S. Capitol, pressured state election officials to change vote counts and allowed surrogates to vilify election workers (and then take the fall). That candidate is Trump, whose rhetoric and actions speak volumes about his intent.
It’s worth noting that nationally, many recent Republican campaigns have been gun-centric. Candidates pose with families with guns for all. On video a candidate shoots up stylized “RINOs.” Advertisements center an actual target on an image of the opposition. Republican campaigns have (far more often than Democratic campaigns) indulged in violent rhetoric going well beyond imagery about fighting for one’s constituents. In one case a candidate body-slammed a reporter.
I am appalled by the assassination attempt, whatever its roots. I am glad Trump still has two ears to call his own. But it also seems to me that he and his party are reaping violence whose seeds they’ve sown. And that merits contrition, not braggadocio.
Charles Watt, St. Paul
•••