•••
Here we go again: accelerating coverage of the former president, once again a presidential candidate. We'll get to read and hear everything he says, and it will worm its way into our brain, if we let it. Mr. T has a real talent for saying provocative things — inflated promises, wounded honor, withering attacks, hyperbolic self-congratulation. Like raw meat, all this is irresistible to a hungry news cycle. He will not be ignored, and so the fire hose of his verbiage will drown us.
His critics will fact-check and tally his "lies." But I don't think he is actually guilty of lying. The liar knows the truth and crafts his lie accordingly. T-man is not so much a liar as a world-class BS-er. He says whatever he wants with no regard whatsoever for the truth. It is pure performance, designed to excite the base and set his critics' hair on fire. News outlets make sure we hear the latest.
But I don't think his BS is actually newsworthy. Performative speech is not real news. It is potentially harmful, however. So, I will refuse to pay attention. I will continue to follow what our past president actually does, but I will turn the page and mute the sound when he is just flapping his gums.
Steven Blons, St. Paul
POLITICS
State GOP doesn't get it
Andy Brehm lays out the several reasons why Minnesota Republicans have consistently failed at the ballot box with their "current losing political playbook" ("Make the GOP relevant again," Opinion Exchange, June 23). Not to disappoint his political fellows, however, he makes certain to inject familiar slams on the Democrats, with statements like "the dishonesty of many Democratic candidates" and says, "conservatives are angry at what the radical left is doing to our beloved country and once thriving state."
But the inability to win in Minnesota is also Brehm's personal inability to jettison the party's current racist rhetoric. The Republican talking point and line from Brehm speaks clearly to Minnesota voters: "Democrats' weak and woke approach to crime continues to perpetuate lawlessness ..." The injection, and subsequent rejection of that one word — woke — places Brehm squarely among his unsuccessful political peers. In their denial of its meaning — an understanding of institutional racism in the U.S. — they have cast aside the reality of historic and ongoing oppression of African Americans and other racial and ethnic groups.