I'm a pacifist, but I have a question: When a demagogue/fascist/dictator chooses to invade other countries and the rest of the world chooses not to use military force, what's to stop him from continuing?
I'm struggling watching the Ukrainian people fight by themselves. It feels like watching a bully beat up a vulnerable kid on the playground in seventh grade and having a large group of us choosing to stand by and watch.
I understand sanctions are real consequences. It's kind of like sending the bully to detention — the bully is back on the playground the next day. The kid who got beat up is bloody, bruised, emotionally traumatized and fearful. Those of us who stood and watched are guilt-ridden. Our hugs for the victim ring hollow. The victim looked up to see us stand and watch as they got brutalized.
Nuclear weapons are like knowing the bully has an assault rifle at home and has threatened to use it if you get in his way or try to punish him.
I'm struggling with when it's appropriate to use protective use of force or just-war theory. I wonder if every head of state is struggling with the same conflict of values.
I loathe bullies. I loathe the use of violence. I loathe military destructiveness. I loathe our capacity to destroy our planet with nuclear bombs.
I hate being in this paradox. I hate Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Tim Reardon, Plymouth