Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
For an editor who used to handle Syl Jones, there is a special poignancy in noting that his death came just five days after Donald Trump was elected to another term in the White House (obituary, Nov. 13).
Excuse me. Did I say I used to “handle” Syl Jones? There was no handling him. His presence on this publication’s opinion pages was a challenge — to editors, to readers, to Minnesota, to the establishment and to the human conscience most of all. It was also a gift — one that sometimes felt like a curse.
His commentaries spared nothing and nobody from his criticism, least of all editors who tried to coax him into less sweeping condemnations of the racist attitudes that he saw as underpinning our society. Jones seemed to take special delight in flaying well-meaning white people who were proudly, perhaps smugly, trying to do the right thing. Myself included.
“It is a mistake to believe that good intentions alone can produce excellent results in any endeavor,” he wrote in a 1990 critique of this newspaper’s reporting on race relations. “[G]ood intentions may be viewed as just another attempt by a paternalistic white organization to assuage its conscience.” Elsewhere in that essay he declared that the Star Tribune’s editors had displayed the “height of hypocrisy.”
Jones’ contributions to the Star Tribune spanned more than two decades, beginning with that essay in 1990. He had moved on to other endeavors by the time Trump first ran for president. The archives of his work show only fleeting references to Trump, like this one in 1993: “A capitalist democracy often inspires disenfranchised citizens to become small-time hustlers and criminal entrepreneurs — shadow figures of Donald Trump and Michael Milken.”
Today, we can be sure, the references would not be so fleeting. Jones’ columns were master classes in the dissection of racism, conducted with extra-credit seminars in racism that goes by other names, like “insensitivity.” He would see the nascent Trump administration as a target-rich environment.